Artificial Intelligence in Port Equipment Selection

Optimizing Decisions with Generative Models

Authors

  • Luiz Filipe de Lara Lima Fatec Rubens Lara
  • Luiz Felipe Rampazzo Fatec Rubens Lara
  • Vitor Daniel Oliveira da Silva Fatec Rubens Lara
  • Álvaro Camargo Prado Fatec Rubens Lara
  • Luciana Maria Guimaraes Fatec Rubens Lara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20214738

Keywords:

Equipment selection, Generative artificial intelligence, Decision matrix, Reach stacker, Container terminals

Abstract

The proper selection of port equipment is essential to ensure operational efficiency and the competitiveness of container terminals. This article proposes a methodology that integrates the Decision Matrix with Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to enhance the equipment selection process, using the Reach Stacker as a case study. The approach aims to compare catalogs from various manufacturers, refining technical descriptions through access prompts to obtain more precise and efficient responses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BICHOU, K. A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaport operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 41, n. 6, p. 469–487, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2004.06.001. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2025.

BICHOU, K. Port operations, planning and logistics. In: TALLEY, W. K. (Ed.). Port Economics. London: Routledge, 2011. p. 123–145.

CULLINANE, K.; WANG, T. The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, v. 10, n. 3, p. 237–252, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560701467120. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2025.

DEKKER, R.; BLOEMHOF, J.; MALLIDIS, I. Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 219, n. 3, p. 671–679, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2025.

HWANG, C. L.; YOON, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.

IBM. Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making. International Business Machines Corporation, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ibm.com/artificial-intelligence. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2025.

JAIN, L. C.; KRISHNA, C. K. Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2001.

JURAFSKY, D.; MARTIN, J. H. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. 3. ed. Draft. 2024. Disponível em: https://stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2025.

KHOSHELHAM, K.; WANG, Z.; ZHANG, J. Multi-criteria decision-making for equipment selection: A review. ResearchGate, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387021549. Acesso em: 06 mai. 2025.

MACHARIS, C.; DE WITTE, A.; TURCKAERT, M. Multi-criteria analysis as a tool to include stakeholders in project evaluation: The MAMCA method. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.012. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2025.

MUBASHIR, M. et al. A survey on data normalization techniques in machine learning. Applied Sciences, v. 14, n. 14, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/14/6174. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2025.

NOTTEBOOM, T.; RODRIGUE, J.-P. Port Economics, Management and Policy. London: Routledge, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.routledge.com/Port-Economics-Management-and-Policy/Notteboom-Pallis-Rodrigue/p/book/9780367331584. Acesso em: 04 mai. 2025.

NOTTEBOOM, T.; VERNIMMEN, B. The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 17, n. 5, p. 325–337, 2009. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.05.003. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2025.

SAATY, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

SAATY, T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, v. 1, n. 1, p. 83–98, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2025.

SHRESTHA, Y. R.; BEN-MENAHEM, S.; VON KROGH, G. Leveraging AI for Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer, 2021.

STEENKEN, D.; VOß, S.; STAHNBERG, R. Container terminal operation and operations research – A classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, v. 26, n. 1, p. 3–49, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-003-0157-z. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2025.

TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000.

UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2021. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2021. Disponível em: https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime-transport-2021. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2025.

VENKATASUBRAMANIAN, V. Data Science for Engineering Decision Making. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019.

ZELENY, M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.

ZHANG, X.; KUMAR, S. Decision-making models for port equipment selection integrating sustainability indicators. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, v. 11, n. 3, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/3/607. Acesso em: 08 mai. 2025.

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Lima, L. F. de L., Rampazzo, L. F., Silva, V. D. O. da, Prado, Álvaro C., & Guimaraes, L. M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Port Equipment Selection: Optimizing Decisions with Generative Models. Advances in Global Innovation & Technology, 4(2), e42008. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20214738

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.